Warn Status

Another thing that was in the Pokemon Vortex forums that could be really handy over here is a warn status. So let's say Member A swears at Member B. An Administrator/Moderator can give Member A a warn. So in those forums, it goes by 33.3%. So first warn: 33.3%. Second warn: 67%. Third and final warn: 100%. If a person's warn status reaches 100%, they can be permanently banned, or temporarily banned. It depends on your choices if you want it to be permanent or temporary. But this can be really helpful. You can also decide what percent it goes by. It's totally up to you, I won't make the decision. Think about it, and try it out if you'd like. I can answer your questions if you have any.

hey mounthagane,
dun u think that 20% wud be more than enough.
hey and shadow this topic doesn't really suits to feedback thread.

rahul999rap wrote:hey mounthagane,
dun u think that 20% wud be more than enough.
hey and shadow this topic doesn't really suits to feedback thread.

20%?????? Are you crazy?? That means 4 warnings and then a ban? I'll go with 33%, 67% and then a ban. What do you guys think? Oh, and this does go in the Feedback section because it is a comment to make these forums better.

20% because it gives people time to change.
And yes this thread belongs in this section.

Tiggy wrote:20% because it gives people time to change.
And yes this thread belongs in this section.

Fine then. In the middle. 25%?

shadowvillain99 wrote:

Tiggy wrote:20% because it gives people time to change.
And yes this thread belongs in this section.

Fine then. In the middle. 25%?

well wbo has donw it 20% and has the highest and best security therefore they must have set 20% by thinking something. Well that says i think 20% is enough

WBO has 10% .
It has been decided it will be 25% per warning given.
4 warnings and u will be gone depending on the decision of aboard member.

Ok then. I just didn't want to be sooo easy on a person because 5 warnings is quite a lot. Will it be a temporary ban, or permanent?

It is up to you to decide.
Whether to ban them temporary or permanently, its none of my bussiness.

Why? Admins shouldn't ban?

Well administrators on all forums I know are the ones who ban members but moderators here can also ban users.

So why don't you and Harry-Potter make the decision?

Only moderators and administrators can ban members

Then I say temporary.

TEMPORARY it is then.

Issue is that this isn't a paid server!
so i can't get all the facilities for free!
So It's up to donators to bring us front!